In addition, regarding the correspondence between the descriptions given to each diagnosis of Personality Disorders, they do not maintain sufficient correspondence with the signs observed in clinical patients in consultation, as well as excessively wide clinical pictures overlap.
Simply, no studies have been conducted to support such data, just as the differentiation between the clusters (clusters A, B and C) does not seem justified: category or second.Īnother important point refers to the validity indices obtained in the scientific investigations that support this classification. Even specifying that there must be a significant functional deterioration in the individual's personal and social performance, as well as the manifestation of a stable psychological and behavioral repertoire over time of an inflexible and maladaptive character, it is difficult and complex to identify which population profiles belong to the former. On the other hand, it is very complex to differentiate between the continuum of marked personality trait (normality) and extreme and pathological personality trait (personality disorder). More specifically, a great correspondence has been found between Schizotypal Personality Disorder and Schizophrenia between Paranoid Personality Disorder and Delusional Disorder between Borderline Personality Disorder and Mood Disorders Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, mainly.
#BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER DSM 5 PLUS#
The latter is due to the fact that the DSM requires meeting a minimum number of criteria (half plus one) but does not indicate any as necessarily mandatory. According to the authors, this process could have a positive impact on an increase in the validity indexes of diagnoses as well as a reduction in the overlap of multiple diagnoses applied to the clinical population. Thus, in one work together with Esbec (2011) they have shown the need to carry out a complete reformulation of both the diagnostic nosologies and the criteria to be included for each of them.
#BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER DSM 5 MANUAL#
With regard to the most current versions of the DSM (DSM-IV TR of 2000 and DSM-5 of 2013), various renowned authors such as Echeburúa, from the University of the Basque Country, have already demonstrated the controversy of the classification of Personality Disorders (PD) in the manual predecessor to the current one, the DSM-IV-TR. Despite the fact that each new publication has tried to achieve a higher rate of consensus among experts, the truth is that the existence of a sector of the community of professionals in Psychology and Psychiatry that shows its reservations about this classification system of mental pathologies.
The various updates published by the American Psychiatric Association that have been shaping the versions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders have traditionally been the object of criticism and discrepancies. Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder Antisocial / Psychopathic Personality Disorder
Proposals to improve the TP classification system.Classification problems of Personality Disorders in DSM 5.Personality Disorders in DSM-5: controversies in the classification system - psychology Content: Personality Disorders in DSM-5: controversies in the classification system
0 kommentar(er)
